October ’26 Tournament Results – Back in the Harbourside Restaurant – Lunch and Buchholz!

We were back in the Harbourside Restaurant this month as there was a huge wedding taking place in the Member’s Bar.
Looking at all the members sitting down to lunch I wondered if Backgammon takes 2nd place to friends sharing a meal together! I derive a huge amount of pleasure from it 😊

Dave took out the 1st prize with an undefeated 4/4 A bottle of wine and $120. Well done!
Matt 2nd, returning after a period of absence 3/4  +9. A bottle of wine and $80.
Your TD 3rd, 3/4 +8 and $40

I’ll mention 4th and 5th as this will have a bearing on the next part of my report: Paula 3/4 +7 and Adam 3/4 -3.

By accident I ran Buchholz on the results on Saturday which meant I had to calculate the differences by hand. I can confirm that I was correct. But I thought I’d explain Buchholz in detail as it was a topic of conversation over lunch.

Buchholz = total of opponents’ wins (bye rounds use the players average as a substitute).

First, the wins for each player after R4:

(Dave 4), Matthew 3, John 3, Paula 3, Adam 3

Now Buchholz for each:


Paula (B’holz = 12)
Opponents: Matt (3), Noah (2), Adam (3), Dave (4)
Average = (3+2+3+4) = 12

Paula played the strongest field — two players with 3 wins and the tournament winner. That’s why she ranks highest among the 3-win players.


TD (B’holz = 10)
Opponents: Marina (2), Steve (2), Dave (4), Philip (2)
Average = (2+2+4+2) = 10

I played Dave (the winner) which boosted my score significantly.


Adam (B’holz = 9.33)
R1 opponent was Bye → use average of other 3 opponents = 2.33
Opponents: Philip (2), Paula (3), Marina (2)
Average = (2.33+2+3+2) = 9.33


Matt (B’holz = 8)
Opponents: Paula (3), Hammon (2), Zach (1), Steve C (2)
Average = (3+2+1+2) = 8

Matt played the weakest field of the four — notably Zach who only won 1 match, and Hammon. Despite having the best T/Diff among the 3-win players, Buchholz drops him to last among them because his opponents, on the day, were weaker.


Summary:

Buchholz rewards players who play stronger opponents. Paula rose to the top because 2 players had at least 3 wins including the tournament winner with 4. Matthew dropped despite his big point differential because two of his opponents only won 1-2 matches overall. Buchholz essentially asks “how hard was your path to 3 wins?” — and Paula’s path was the hardest.

I hope that clarifies how Buchholz works, but remember, its only a proposal for next year and only if wins and differences can’t split the top placed players.

Your thoughts and comments are welcomed.

Thanks for the photos Adam.

This entry was posted in Blog. Bookmark the permalink.